Change about documents

doc/guide/about.md

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 ## STDF 名称
 
-STDF 中的 S 和 T 表示 Svelte 和 Tailwind，DF 可以看成作者 ID 🤪。
+常规解释：S 代表 Simple（简单），T 代表 Thin（轻量），D 代表 Design（设计），F 代表 Fast（快速）。如此解释的话，STDF 代表一个使用简单、体积轻量、设计友好、开发快速的组件库。
 
-另一种解释，S 代表 Simple（简单），T 代表 Thin（轻量），D 代表 Design（设计），F 代表 Fast（快速）。这样的话，STDF 就是一个简单、轻量、设计友好、快速的 UI 组件库。
+非常规解释：S 和 T 分别代表 Svelte 和 Tailwind，因为 STDF 是基于 Svelte 和 Tailwind 的。DF 可以看成诗人杜甫，不像李白那么浪漫飘逸，他注重的是实用性与易用性，这也是 STDF 的设计理念。希望每一位使用 STDF 的开发者都能写出诗一般的代码。
 
 ## 为什么要做这个库
 

doc/guide/about_en.md

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 ## STDF Name
 
-In STDF, S and T stand for Svelte and Tailwind, while DF can be seen as the author's ID. 😜
+Generally speaking, S stands for Simple, T stands for Thin, D stands for Design, and F stands for Fast. So, STDF is a simple, lightweight, design-friendly, and fast UI component library.
 
-Another interpretation is that S stands for Simple, T stands for Thin, D stands for Design, and F stands for Fast. So, STDF is a simple, lightweight, design-friendly, and fast UI component library.
+Unconventional explanation: S and T stand for Svelte and Tailwind respectively, because STDF is based on Svelte and Tailwind. DF can be seen as the poet Du Fu, who is not as romantic and elegant as Li Bai. He pays attention to practicality and ease of use, which is also the design concept of STDF. I hope that every developer who uses STDF can write code like a poem.
 
 ## Why Create This Library
 
@@ -16,4 +16,4 @@ After experiencing Svelte and Tailwind, I found that developing with them is rea
 
 ## Applicable Scenarios
 
-There is a mobile business scenario where the application is not too complex, and developing with Vue or React may appear to be "overkill." The entire application package JS size may only be a few tens of KB, but using Vue or React would result in the base sizes of these two libraries exceeding tens of KB, which would be too costly. Additionally, it is not desirable to have a large volume of To C applications on mobile platforms. However, developing with pure native JS would appear to be inefficient. In such cases, Svelte is a good choice. Its concise syntax gives native JS code responsive capabilities.
+There is a mobile business scenario where the application is not too complex, and developing with Vue or React may appear to be "overkill." The entire application package JS size may only be a few tens of KB, but using Vue or React would result in the base sizes of these two libraries exceeding tens of KB, which would be too costly. Additionally, it is not desirable to have a large volume of To C applications on mobile platforms. However, developing with pure native JS would appear to be inefficient. In such cases, Svelte is a good choice. Its concise syntax gives native JS code responsive capabilities.